<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Linden LAN &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lindenlan.net/tag/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lindenlan.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 04:54:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Adobe Should Grow A Pair</title>
		<link>http://www.lindenlan.net/2010/04/08/adobe-should-grow-a-pair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindenlan.net/2010/04/08/adobe-should-grow-a-pair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 02:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindenlan.net/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So according to Daring Fireball Apple’s new iPhone Developer Program License Agreement effectively bans Adobe’s Flash-to-iPhone compiler. CS5 is thisclose to release and the iPhone compiler is the flagship feature in this version of Flash. They’re pretty much royally fucked. Plus Apple has already made its position clear on Flash. Personally, since I’ve never been [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So according to <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2010/04/iphone_agreement_bans_flash_compiler">Daring Fireball</a> Apple’s new iPhone Developer Program License Agreement effectively bans Adobe’s Flash-to-iPhone compiler.  </p>
<blockquote><p>CS5 is <em>thisclose</em> to release and the iPhone compiler is the flagship feature in this version of Flash. They’re pretty much royally fucked.</p></blockquote>
<p>Plus Apple has already made its position clear on Flash.  Personally, since I’ve never been a slave to brands, I don’t have much of a stake in either company unless one of my mutual funds happens to invest in one. Yet, the way I see it, Adobe can really give Apple the big “Fuck You” if it wanted to, simply by no longer producing any of its Adobe software for OS X.  Now seeing how designers and design houses invest heavily in Macs simply to run Adobe software, should that platform no longer become available, what do you think is going to happen?  Is the entire graphic design, web, print, and publishing industries going to abandon all its invested know-how and simply pick a new defacto industry standard, or are they going to switch to  Windows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindenlan.net/2010/04/08/adobe-should-grow-a-pair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spoof The iPad User-Agent And See The “AdLib” Framework In Action</title>
		<link>http://www.lindenlan.net/2010/04/08/spoof-the-ipad-user-agent-and-see-the-adlib-framework-in-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindenlan.net/2010/04/08/spoof-the-ipad-user-agent-and-see-the-adlib-framework-in-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 07:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindenlan.net/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported on Almost Done, Apple apparently has its own iPad-specific web framework, which Jim Hoskins has dubbed AdLib. If you don’t own an iPad, you can still have a look at it by spoofing the user-agent courtesy of LifeHacker. Mozilla/5.0(iPad; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.21.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As reported on Almost Done, Apple apparently has its own iPad-specific web framework, which Jim Hoskins has dubbed <a href="http://almost.done21.com/2010/04/adlib-apples-secret-ipad-web-framework/">AdLib</a>.  If you don’t own an iPad, you can still have a look at it by spoofing the user-agent courtesy of <a href="http://lifehacker.com/5508260/how-to-use-gmails-attractive-new-tablet+friendly-interface-on-your-regular-old-computer">LifeHacker</a>.</p>
<pre class="brush: bash">
Mozilla/5.0(iPad; U; CPU iPhone OS 3_2 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.21.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.4 Mobile/7B314 Safari/531.21.10
</pre>
<p>I tried Firefox and Chrome using their respective user-agent switcher plugins, but didn’t get very far.  So go into Safari and select Develop-&gt;User Agent-&gt;Other…  Paste in the above string, click OK, and make sure it’s active.  Next navigate to <a href="http://help.apple.com/ipad/mobile/interface/">iPad User Guide</a> and check it out.  Here’s hoping Apple will be releasing it independently or as a part of the SDK.  Here’s also hoping it’s iPhone-compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindenlan.net/2010/04/08/spoof-the-ipad-user-agent-and-see-the-adlib-framework-in-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9600M GT versus 8600M GT versus 9400M</title>
		<link>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/10/15/9600m-gt-versus-8600m-gt-versus-9400m/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/10/15/9600m-gt-versus-8600m-gt-versus-9400m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 08:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/10/15/9600m-gt-versus-8600m-gt-versus-9400m/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m in the market for a new laptop and I purposefully waited for the new MacBooks to be released. I priced out a Dell XPS M1330 and once the features are matched up as close as I can make them, there’s a $60 price difference in favor of the Dell. $1599 vs $1533. The MacBook [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m in the market for a new laptop and I purposefully waited for the new MacBooks to be released.  I priced out a Dell XPS M1330 and once the features are matched up as close as I can make them, there’s a $60 price difference in favor of the Dell.  $1599 vs $1533.  The MacBook comes out ahead in GPU, FSB, and operating system (OS X &gt; Vista because of Unix) and the Dell comes out ahead in terms of connectors (HDMI, Firewire, card reader, ExpressCard slot, etc.).  I tried to configure a comparable Ubuntu machine, but the processor speed is fixed at 2.0 GHz and easily went over compared to the $1299 MacBook.  The only competitor now is a late model 15″ MacBook Pro which for refurb starts at $1349—a very tasty price indeed.  The MBP matches the advantages of the m1330 and has a better GPU, screen size, and resolution than the new MacBook.  How much better is the GPU?  Let’s see.</p>
<p><span id="more-64"></span></p>
<p>Based on the numbers provided by the <a href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/specialevent1008/">keynote</a>, the 9400M is 82% as good as the 8600M GT at best and 55% as good at worst.  Looking at the <a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/graphics.html">numbers on the Apple website</a>, comparing the new MacBook Pro to the new MacBook, the 9600M GT is 1.5 to 2.3 times better than the 9400M.  I also looked at the <a href="http://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html">benchmarks at Notebookcheck.com</a> which say that the 9600M GT is 25% better than the 8600M GT and the 8400M is only 44% as good as the 8600M GT.  So with all these relative numbers, the ranking is approximately:</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>9600M GT</td>
<td>100%</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8600M GT</td>
<td>80%</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>9400M</td>
<td>67%</td>
<td>44%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>8400M GS</td>
<td>35%</td>
<td></td>
</table>
<p>If you’re not convinced, here’s the sanity check… 67/80 ~= 82%.  44/80 = 55%.  100/67 ~= 1.5.  100/44 ~= 2.3.  (100–80)/80 = 25%.  </p>
<p>So is having 1lb less weight and faster FSB and memory at the cost of having a GPU that’s 55% to 82% as good, smaller screen/resolution, and less connections worth an extra $250?  I don’t plan to travel much, but when I do I like to travel light.  I don’t plan to game, and I’m more likely to do more computationally intensive tasks than graphic intensive tasks.  I also don’t own that many peripherals.  While home, the laptop will be hooked up to an external monitor.  The new MacBook fits my needs better, but the late model MacBook Pro seems to be the better value.  I’ve got the money sitting in the bank.  Decisions, decisions.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE (04 Jan 2009):</strong> Two and a half weeks ago, I was hired by a company as a contractor and they are predominantly Macs.  The fan on my old Compaq seemed to be dying since the laptop overheats and freezes, so it had to be replaced.  So I settled on purchasing a 15″ early-2008 MacBook Pro.  My primary reason was lighting in the office was not conducive to a glossy screen and I got more bang for the buck with the MPB since there was very little performance advantages between the old and newer models. Then of course I hear it’s not easy to drag &amp; drop and use graphic editors with the new trackpad.  Plus I didn’t have to go through the added hassle and expense of purchasing an adapter for hooking up to my monitor.  For resale value, I opted to get the 2.5 GHz with 512MB video ram for $1499 since the hard drive and memory can be upgraded later.  In any case, it’s still cheaper than the 13″ 2.4 GHz Macbook.  However, having traveled with this laptop to LA and back, I have to say, a 13″ version would have been more comfortable to use on the plane.  Here’s hoping Apple, brings back matte screens and lowers the price on the 13″ models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/10/15/9600m-gt-versus-8600m-gt-versus-9400m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Better Manage Your iPod/iPhone Podcasts</title>
		<link>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/08/17/how-to-better-manage-your-ipod-iphone-podcasts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/08/17/how-to-better-manage-your-ipod-iphone-podcasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 05:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/08/17/how-to-better-manage-your-ipodiphone-podcasts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like to use my iPhone for viewing podcasts. However, managing them through iTunes leaves much to be desired because some podcasts I like to view and then trash them, while others I like to archive and have synced at all times. iTunes does not have an obvious way to set this up. First, click [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to use my iPhone for viewing podcasts.  However, <a href="http://my.opera.com/usability/blog/2006/10/27/itunes-as-a-podcast-manager">managing them through iTunes leaves much to be desired</a> because some podcasts I like to view and then trash them, while others I like to archive and have synced at all times.  iTunes does not have an obvious way to set this up.</p>
<p><span id="more-62"></span></p>
<p>First, click on your device.  Then go to the Podcasts tab.  Sync all unplayed episodes of selected podcasts and check only those podcasts you don’t want to sync permanently.  </p>
<p>Now for those podcasts you want to sync permanently things get a little complicated because you also want to automatically include any new podcasts when iTunes downloads them.  To accomplish this you need to setup a Smart Playlist.  So create a new Smart Playlist.  For the first rule, set “Podcast is true”.  For the second rule, set “Album contains” and then type in the name of the podcast that is in the album field.  This field isn’t on by default so you may want to adjust the View Options so that field is visible.  Make sure Live updating is checked (default).  Once you have your Smart Playlist set up, I recommend you rename it to the podcast name.  Also view the playlist to confirm the Smart List matches the correct podcasts and sort the playlist the way you want.  The iPod/iPhone will keep this sort order.</p>
<p>Once you have all your Smart Playlists setup, click your device again and go to the Music tab.  Check Sync music and Selected playlists.  Then check off the playlists you want to sync including the Smart Playlists you created for your podcasts.  That should do it.  Hopefully, this will improve the way you manage your podcasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/08/17/how-to-better-manage-your-ipod-iphone-podcasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My First Bite Of An Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/07/21/my-first-bite-of-an-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/07/21/my-first-bite-of-an-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/07/21/my-first-bite-of-an-apple/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January, last year, I had thought perhaps my switch to Apple would begin with the first rev iPhone. By the time the iPhone debuted it didn’t provide a good enough value proposition for me then. Fast-forward to July 12th, and you would have found me standing in line to buy an iPhone 3G. I did [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>January, last year, I had thought perhaps <a href="http://www.lindenlan.net/2007/01/10/good-phone-hunting/">my switch to Apple would begin with the first rev iPhone</a>.  By the time the iPhone debuted it didn’t provide a good enough value proposition for me then.  Fast-forward to July 12th, and you would have found me standing in line to buy an iPhone 3G.</p>
<p><span id="more-60"></span></p>
<p>I did manage to buy an iPhone 3G.  However, it was far from a smooth process.  I called AT&amp;T and the Cherry Creek Apple store to check availability and also if they can handle porting my number from a prepaid to a postpaid account.  Apple said they had the phones in stock, and both said they could handle the number transfer.  4 hours later, after driving and waiting in line,  I’m lead into the store by an associate named Kevin Cullins.  Everything about the purchase was going smoothly up until the point Kevin tried to activate the phone and was informed by the device that the number was a prepaid account and that I either had to open a new account or go see an AT&amp;T representative. Not wanting to disappoint, Kevin suggested I go to the local AT&amp;T store just a block away and talk to his contact, Joel, and see about a way to correct the situation.   Once I explained my situation to Joel, he relayed it to his boss, Greg, who personally came out and told me to go back to the Apple store, purchase the iPhone but start a new account, and then return to the AT&amp;T store where they’d switch my old number for the new one and then cancel the new one.  After following his instructions, I was finally able to go home with my new phone.  The lesson here: if you’re an AT&amp;T prepaid customer, upgrade to an iPhone at an AT&amp;T store.  Thanks go out to the Apple and AT&amp;T staff for making what could have been a bad experience into a good one.</p>
<p>To help pay for my iPhone, I finally dropped my land line which I used to give out to businesses.  It was a $45 per month luxury that when compared to a 3G data plan at $30 per month, provided little benefit.  I was hoping I would stay with a prepaid plan, but after calculating the costs over 2-years, the prepaid play would have been $160 more.  So unless the contract-less price of the iPhone drops by at least $200 it’s not worth it in my opinion unless your credit doesn’t allow you to go with a contract.  (Though if your credit is that bad, is an expensive smart-phone really for you?)</p>
<p>So I’ve been using it for over a week, and I have to say I’ve been thoroughly pleased with my purchase.   I’ve been using many of the features daily, and in fact, it helped with documenting my accident on Saturday where I got rear-ended where I was able to take pictures and notes.  My favorite apps are Pandora and VNC.  Pandora gives me customized, commercial-free (for now) internet radio that follows me everywhere I have AT&amp;T data service.  Much better than XM radio feature-wise if not quality wise.  Because the iPhone 2.0 software now supports VPN, VNC lets me log onto my machines at work.  All that’s missing now is native shell access. Jailbreaking my phone looks awfully appealing now.</p>
<p>I’ve tried other people’s Blackberries, Kyoceras, and Treos, and none of them were intuitive to use.  I don’t need MMS, heck I don’t even have a txting plan which is an indication of how much I use it.  A tactile keyboard isn’t necessary for me.  If anything, I wish the phone had a better camera hardware and software comparable to what’s found on phones by SonyEricsson and Nokia.  Copy and paste would be nice, but it’s not a deal-breaker.  The iPhone is not perfect, far from it, but it offered me the best value proposition.  I’m looking forward to the Android phones that will compete directly with the iPhone.  By then, my contract should be over or I’d be eligible for an upgrade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/07/21/my-first-bite-of-an-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Half-Priced iPhone 3G: Not So Fast</title>
		<link>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/06/09/half-priced-iphone-3g-not-so-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/06/09/half-priced-iphone-3g-not-so-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/06/09/half-priced-iphone-3g-not-so-fast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you really saving any money? Not really. 2-year contract iPhone (8GB) iPhone 3G (8GB) Phone $400 $200 Voice $960 $960 Data $480 $720 Total $1840 $1880 The new phone costs $40 more over the life of the 2-year contract. The upfront costs are lower. The browser speed is over 3 times faster than the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you really saving any money?  Not really.</p>
<table>
<tr>
<td>2-year contract</td>
<th>iPhone (8GB)</th>
<th>iPhone 3G (8GB)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Phone</th>
<td>$400</td>
<td>$200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Voice</th>
<td>$960</td>
<td>$960</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Data</th>
<td>$480</td>
<td>$720</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Total</th>
<td>$1840</td>
<td>$1880</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><br/></p>
<p><span id="more-59"></span></p>
<p>The new phone costs $40 more over the life of the 2-year contract.  The upfront costs are lower.  The browser speed is over 3 times faster than the original iPhone.  Better features. But it still practically costs the same which, with all the upgrades, makes it a better value proposition than before.  </p>
<p>The bottom line is that it’s an $80 per month expense.  It seems AT&amp;T won’t be providing a GoPhone option either which could have saved an additional $10–15.   I wonder if you can choose an Edge data plan instead of a 3G data plan; that could be one way to save some money I suppose.</p>
<p>So yeah, the half-price savings is an illusion.  You don’t save any money at all, but you do get improved features in exchange, and you’re not shelling out a fortune with the initial purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/06/09/half-priced-iphone-3g-not-so-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Fell Too Far From The Tree This Time</title>
		<link>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/01/15/apple-fell-too-far-from-the-tree-this-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/01/15/apple-fell-too-far-from-the-tree-this-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/01/15/apple-fell-too-far-from-the-tree-this-time/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So the keynote has come and gone. My prediction like many others didn’t pan out as expected. The MacBook Air is yet one of Apple’s many love-it-or-hate-it products. It appeals to some but certainly not all. I think the biggest problem Apple made is in the pricing. The price just isn’t in line with the [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the keynote has come and gone.  <a href="http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/01/14/will-the-new-mac-be-an-ultraportable/">My prediction</a> like many others didn’t pan out as expected.  The MacBook Air is yet one of Apple’s many love-it-or-hate-it products.  It appeals to some but certainly not all.  I think the biggest problem Apple made is in the pricing.  The price just isn’t in line with the raw specs.  The general consumer isn’t going to care or even necessarily understand that a hard drive with a smaller form factor is more expensive than a larger one with the same capacity.  (e.g. The MacBook Air packs a 1.8″ hard drive and not a typical 2.5″ one.)  Especially considering their own base MacBook is 67% faster with 20% more battery life (user-replaceable) for 39% less money and only for 67% more weight (not that 5 lbs is really all that heavy to begin with).  Would it really have been that hard for Apple to iMac-ify their entire notebook product line, upgrade the touchpads to use the new multitouch features, put LED backlights across the product line, apply some of the MacBook Air design ideas like dropping the super-drive?  That would probably shed a pound off the base MacBook in which case it’s 4 lbs versus MBA’s 3 lbs in the same footprint if not the same volume.     Perhaps like the Newton, the MacBook Air is ahead of its time.  Then again it may be so off the mark it’ll die a slow death unlike the Palm Folio.  Judging from the comments at various sites and forums, I wasn’t the only one hoping for a MacBook redesign which is arguably long overdue.  Consumers weren’t the only ones who were disappointed. Wall Street saw a drop in the stock price which I’m sure will be made up sooner or later.  On a good note, the Apple TV is more appealing, but I would still rather get a Mac Mini and turn it into a MythTV frontend.  So much more versatile.  But before that happens I need to finish outfitting my MythTV server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/01/15/apple-fell-too-far-from-the-tree-this-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will The New Mac Be An Ultraportable?</title>
		<link>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/01/14/will-the-new-mac-be-an-ultraportable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/01/14/will-the-new-mac-be-an-ultraportable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 04:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macbook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/01/14/will-the-new-mac-be-an-ultraportable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow is the infamous Macworld keynote. More than likely a new Mac will be introduced. As the date slowly approaches, the rumor mill has been buzzing about a potential product name called Air—Macbook Air, AirBook, what have you. Of note, is that there was confirmation that Apple had ordered a bunch of 13″ screens. Now, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tomorrow is the infamous Macworld keynote.  More than likely a new Mac will be introduced.  As the date slowly approaches, the rumor mill has been buzzing about a potential product name called <a href="http://doggdot.us/rd/95918/http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/01/breaking-macboo.html">Air</a>—Macbook <em>Air</em>, <em>Air</em>Book, what have you.  Of note, is that there was confirmation that <a href="http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/15687/">Apple had ordered a bunch of 13″ screens</a>.  Now, 13″ screens are certainly on the large side when it comes to screen real estate even if a notebook comes in under 4 lbs.  Personally I think it needs to have small dimensions, not just be lightweight to be considered an ultraportable.  You can’t exactly slip a 13″ notebook as easily as a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASUS_Eee_PC">eeePC</a> into your (man) purse.  There’s also the fact that the standard MacBook looks so out of place with its brethren right now, even if it got a token hardware refresh a few months ago.  Personally, I’m hedging my bets that the new Macbook will most likely be just a redesigned Macbook and will be a stepping stone for design queues to move up into the Pro line.   I’m not the <a href="http://macenstein.com/default/archives/1020">only</a> <a href="http://wphj.wordpress.com/2008/01/13/why-im-wrong-and-there-wont-be-an-ultraportable-mac/">one</a> who thinks this.  (Others speculate that it may turn out to be an iTouch-esque tablet.)  It’ll certainly be lighter, faster, and every inch as beautiful as the other aluminum SKUs, but certainly no eeePC matchup.  Imagine Apple putting out a $500–600 subnotebook.  Would that cannibalize Mini sales?  Probably not.  As the eeePC has shown, niche markets can work.  But still, would Apple even shoot for that price point?  And if you can’t wait for Apple to come out with a subnotebook (assuming one isn’t announced tomorrow), you could always <a href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2007/11/12654/">hack your eeePC to run Mac OS X</a>.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindenlan.net/2008/01/14/will-the-new-mac-be-an-ultraportable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good Phone Hunting</title>
		<link>http://www.lindenlan.net/2007/01/10/good-phone-hunting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lindenlan.net/2007/01/10/good-phone-hunting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lindenlan.net/2007/01/10/good-phone-hunting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The iPhone, after years of speculation, rumor, hope, and anticipation, finally debuted yesterday. The flurry of accolades and criticisms (for a demo product mind you) exploded over the next 24 hours, as Asia and Europe woke up to the news, and the commentary hasn’t slowed down since. I’m going to hold off on my final [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone</a>, after years of speculation, rumor, hope, and anticipation, finally debuted yesterday.  The flurry of accolades and criticisms (for a demo product mind you) exploded over the next 24 hours, as Asia and Europe woke up to the news, and the commentary hasn’t slowed down since.  I’m going to hold off on my final judgment until June, but as far as first impressions go, this one was amazing.</p>
<p><span id="more-21"></span></p>
<p>I’ve been shopping for a new phone for the past year or so.  I appreciate music and all but I’m far from a collector and connoisseur.  In fact, instead of an annual bonus, 2 years ago <a href="http://www.apple.com/ipod/imaging?cidAOSA10000030193">my bosses gave out iPod Nanos</a> which I immediately regifted.  In any case, a phone where music playing was an additional feature wasn’t going to swing my decision.  So when the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_ROKR">Motorola ROKR</a> was introduced I saw it more as a curiosity and when I realized how crippled it was with regard to its primary marketing feature, iTunes, I only foresaw failure.</p>
<p>An early contender for my purchase was the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W800">SE w800i</a> which was soon unseated by its successor the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W810">w810i</a>.  A camera phone sounded more appealing.  A capable point-and-shoot camera that I could have with me at all times would be great.  I have no qualms of using technology that was good enough 2 to 3 years ago if it meant not <a href="http://www.lindenlan.net/2006/12/20/i-have-seven-hundred-chargers/">having to carry multiple devices</a>.  The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K750">k750i</a>, on which both phones are based, had already proven itself the king of 2MP camera phones.</p>
<p>Then the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K800">SE Cybershot k800i</a> was introduced in Europe and so began the agonizing wait for the k790a to be brought here State-side.  The k790a was 3.2MP camera phone with Cybershot optics, electronics, and processing.  I’d be able to create acceptable (if not great) 8x10s rather than be limited to just 4x6s.  As expected, like its predecessor, the k790a became king of the 3MP camera phones.  Unfortunately the expected carrier, Cingular, never picked it up instead opting to stick with the Walkman line of SE phones, despite the incredible success the k800i had in other parts of the world.  k790a is only offered via a few regional carriers (none of which are near me) or via resellers as an unlocked phone (expensive).</p>
<p>The k790a’s major rival was the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N73">Nokia N73</a> which was a full-featured smartphone rather than just a camera phone.  I had considered the N73 but like all other smartphones, they fall short of a true mobile computing device because UIs are slow and clumsy albeit still usable.  Plus applications are often crippled.  The major drawback to the N73 was the lack of wifi.  Given Cingular’s prices on data plans, I wasn’t really looking forward to pay such a premium when I’d rather go to a local coffee shop and logon for free.  </p>
<p>So come this past New Year’s I was at the point where I was about to go buy a w810i.  The price at Cingular dropped to $50–75 with a 2-year contract.  I’d be able to get a phone with 80% of the k790a’s capabilities at 1/4 the cost.  I held out on the purchase just to see what Apple was going to introduce at <a href="http://www.macworldexpo.com/">Macworld</a> 2007.  What debuted was not what I expected.  It exceeded my expectations.  It was a revolutionary step, not the typical evolutionary step more commonly seen in this industry.</p>
<p>This was not just an iPod with a phone slapped on to it (i.e. the opposite of the ROKR).  Each feature was well-thought out from hardware to software and like most Apple products, very well integrated.  As jaw-dropping as some of the individual feature demos were, it was the final “real-world” usage demo that floored me.  Here was a smartphone with features that not only I can use but would <em>want</em> to use.  Plus Apple being Apple prevented Cingular from being Cingular and that was to cripple the phone and bend it to Cingular’s will and brand.  The lack of orange was very apparent to me and am very much happy to see it that way.</p>
<p>I haven’t seen anything this cool in a mobile computing device since the Palm was introduced.   Things I hope to see come to fruition with regards to the iPhone is a terminal shell app.  The ability to dock the device and use full-size peripherals not unlike a laptop.  GPS capability whether its through cell tower triangulation or an actual GPS addon.  An eBook reader app.  VoIP.  Purchase and then sync apps and widgets via iTunes. (Apple should rename the program iSync, Dock Central, or something since it’s evolving past just the iPod.)  A full functioning browser (though I did not see Javascript or Flash during the demo) means web applications will work right out the door (i.e. all those lovely AJAXy Google apps) which sorta gets around the closed doors Apple currently has around the platform.</p>
<p>This is not to say the phone doesn’t have its shortcomings.  No one has yet to see the camera in action.  The platform is currently closed and may require the purchase of a dev license not unlike those for consoles.  Dev kits are rumored to be two years away, anyway.  So the chance we may see homebrew software on this platform is very unlikely if these rumors hold true.  Video iChat was noticeably missing as were internet IM clients.  I expect video conferencing will most likely be introduced with the 3G version of the phone in 2008.</p>
<p>Still, I am admittedly very likely to be an early adopter of this phone.  I had thought my Apple switch would have begun with a Mac Mini or MacBook Pro.  Regardless of this phone’s lineage, it’s going to leave its mark on the world much like the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Startac">StarTAC</a> and the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Razr_V3">RAZR V3</a> (which, if I may remind those price balkers with short memories, debuted at $500 w/contract).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lindenlan.net/2007/01/10/good-phone-hunting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
